Table of Contents
Former England striker Daniel Sturridge emphasized that Liverpool felt the absence of Luis Diaz during their 2-1 defeat to Chelsea in the Premier League on Saturday.
Sturridge mentioned that Liverpool lacked the pressing and defensive work rate that Diaz provided, especially after his departure to Bayern Munich during the summer transfer window.
The 36-year-old observed that Liverpool forwards Hugo Ekitike and Alexander Isak are primarily offensive players, whereas Diaz was known for contributing more defensively.
“Luis Diaz is a significant loss for them,” Sturridge told Sky Sports. “When we reflect on Liverpool's performance last year and their pressing style, he was arguably the key player who initiated the press in the front three.
“He added a unique quality to that attacking line, which they are now missing.
“While Ekitike and Isak do put in effort off the ball, they are more focused on attacking, and I believe Luis Diaz was more willing to sacrifice himself defensively.”
Chelsea secured victory against Liverpool with goals from Moises Caicedo and Estevao, while Cody Gakpo found the net for Arne Slot’s side at Stamford Bridge.
FAQs
Why is Luis Diaz considered a significant loss for Liverpool?
Luis Diaz is seen as a crucial player due to his ability to initiate pressing in the front line and his willingness to contribute defensively, which Liverpool missed during their recent match against Chelsea.
What did Sturridge say about Liverpool's attacking players?
Sturridge noted that while Ekitike and Isak are talented attackers, they are more focused on offensive play compared to Diaz, who balanced his attacking duties with defensive contributions.
