Table of Contents
- Ruling by Justice James Omotosho
- Description of Nnamdi Kanu
- Restrictions on Digital Devices
- Protective Custody
- Forfeiture of Equipment
Justice James Omotosho has prohibited IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu from utilizing digital devices, such as phones and computers, during his life sentence for terrorism.
In delivering the judgment in Kanu’s trial, Justice Omotosho labeled him a terrorist whose actions have caused bloodshed and instability throughout the South-East region.
He stated, “From the evidence I have reviewed, the convict has previously utilized digital devices, including phones, to disseminate messages that incited violence.
“Consequently, I completely concur with the prosecution that he should not be permitted access to any digital device. If access is deemed necessary, it must be strictly monitored by the Office of the National Security Advisor.”
Justice Omotosho further remarked that, due to the severity of Kanu’s actions, the resulting deaths, and the impact on the people of the South-East, he should be placed in protective custody. The court mandated that Kanu be held in protective custody at an appropriate custodial facility within the country.
Additionally, the court ordered the forfeiture of the transmitter associated with the crimes connected to Camserva to the Federal Government.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the ruling by Justice James Omotosho?
Justice James Omotosho ruled that Nnamdi Kanu must not use any digital devices during his life sentence for terrorism.
Why was Nnamdi Kanu described as a terrorist?
Justice Omotosho described Kanu as a terrorist due to his actions which have led to bloodshed and destabilization in the South-East region.
What restrictions were placed on Kanu regarding digital devices?
The court ruled that Kanu must not be allowed near any digital device, and if access is necessary, it must be closely monitored.
What did the court order regarding Kanu's custody?
The court ordered that Kanu be placed in protective custody at a suitable custodial center in the country.
What was ordered regarding the transmitter linked to the crimes?
The court ordered the forfeiture of the transmitter associated with the crimes to the Federal Government.
