Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Interview Insights
  3. Defection to ADC
  4. Presidential Aspirations
  5. Conclusion

Professor Pat Utomi, a political economist, has stated that he would distance himself from the former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, if Obi chooses to become someone else's running mate.

Professor Utomi made this remark on Thursday during an interview on ‘Politics Today,’ a program on Channels Television that was followed by DAILY POST.

He was discussing Peter Obi’s recent defection to the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

DAILY POST reports that Obi, along with other notable leaders from the Southeast, officially joined the ADC on Wednesday in preparation for the 2027 general elections.

“I can assure you that Peter Obi will run for the presidency in the upcoming 2027 general elections. The moment he agrees to be someone’s running mate, I will step away from supporting him. I can confirm that without a doubt.

“Additionally, it is crucial to recognize that the Nigerian presidency has become a place where individuals go to have the Nigerian state cover their medical expenses.

“This situation is unacceptable. They lack the capability to effectively lead the country. Neither the previous president nor the current one possesses the necessary fitness to manage the affairs of this great nation,” he expressed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Professor Utomi say about Peter Obi's political future?

Professor Utomi indicated that he would withdraw his support for Peter Obi if Obi were to accept a role as someone else's running mate.

What is the significance of Peter Obi's defection to the ADC?

Peter Obi's defection to the ADC is seen as a strategic move as he prepares for the upcoming 2027 general elections, along with other leaders from the Southeast.

What are Professor Utomi's views on the current state of Nigerian leadership?

Professor Utomi expressed that the current and previous Nigerian presidents do not possess the necessary capabilities to effectively lead the nation, viewing the presidency as a position that provides financial benefits rather than true leadership.