Table of Contents
The Rivers State chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has disapproved of the national convention that took place in Ibadan on Saturday. The state chapter claims that the event was unlawful and that its outcomes are not enforceable.
In a statement issued by its Publicity Secretary, Kenneth Yowika, the Rivers PDP praised the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for its absence from the convention, stating that the commission's decision highlights its dedication to due process and democratic principles. The statement referenced two Federal High Court orders that prohibited the PDP from holding the convention, despite a separate High Court in Ibadan granting permission for it.
Despite this, the party moved forward with the election of new national officials and the dissolution of certain state executive committees. Yowika dismissed the convention as a “sham,” criticizing what he called a blatant disregard for valid court orders. He noted that INEC’s decision to abstain illustrated a commitment to the rule of law.
The Rivers PDP asserted that the convention would ultimately be annulled by the courts and encouraged its members to remain resolute and trust the judicial process.
The statement expressed, “The ill-conceived convention cannot endure legal examination as it is currently sub judice at the Court of Appeal.
“We place our trust entirely in the judiciary and urge all members to do the same.”
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Rivers State PDP's stance on the national convention?
The Rivers State PDP has rejected the national convention, labeling it unlawful and claiming its resolutions are unenforceable.
What did the Rivers PDP say about INEC's participation?
The Rivers PDP commended INEC for not participating in the convention, viewing it as a sign of the commission's commitment to due process and democratic norms.
What legal actions are associated with the convention?
The convention is subject to two Federal High Court orders that restrain the PDP from conducting it, and it is currently under judicial review at the Court of Appeal.
