Table of Contents

The Africa Cup of Nations is just around the corner, and even before the tournament kicks off, there is already significant controversy brewing.

African teams have been informed that their European stars may remain with their clubs until Monday, which is eight days later than the usual deadline before a major tournament.

Wolverhampton Wanderers v Manchester United - Premier LeagueBryan Mbeumo may participate for Manchester United on Monday… just days before Afcon beginsCredit: Getty

This has sparked outrage from various managers and federations, who claim there is a clear bias compared to other major tournaments like the World Cup.

With the tournament set to commence next Sunday, coaches have limited time to integrate their top players, many of whom play for some of Europe's leading clubs.

Despite the shortened preparation time, the tournament arrives at a particularly challenging moment, coinciding with a demanding Premier League schedule where teams are already struggling with fixture congestion, injuries, and fatigue.

Managers have been voicing concerns about player burnout for weeks — and now they're expected to manage without more than 40 players during the most intense period of the season.

Mali coach Tom Saintfiet stated: “Everyone in Europe thinks African football is not important. It shows a lack of respect and I am furious.”

Angola coach Patrice Beaumelle expressed his “outrage” after the usual two-week release period for players before major tournaments was reduced to just six days.

He commented: “FIFA only values Africa during elections but does not appreciate our competitions, like Afcon, or grant them the recognition they deserve.”

It’s hard to envision FIFA imposing a six-day release window on European nations before a World Cup, or on South American nations before a Copa America.

The notion of receiving players just a week before the tournament starts is absurd — yet Africa is regularly expected to accept this reduced preparation without complaint.

If you are seeking moral guidance from FIFA — which has just announced the new fines will exceed £3,000 — then I suggest you look elsewhere.

It seems highly likely that Manchester United’s African trio of players will be available for the match on Monday night.

That leaves them with very little time to join their national teams, but it appears FIFA is indifferent to that concern.

As with the recent incident involving — where the punishment for his violent conduct dismissal was inexplicably reduced from three games to one — it highlights the disparity in treatment between certain individuals and others.

The African tournament, held in Morocco until January 18, is of significant domestic interest as numerous Premier League stars are participating.

Sunderland has the most players involved, with nine, followed by Wolves with five, while and will lose four each.

In total, over 40 Premier League players are expected to be absent for the entire tournament — a considerable loss for teams during one of the most demanding times of the season.

Seventeen of the 20 Premier League clubs will lose at least one player, with some teams stripped of key starters.

Britain Premier League SoccerBertrand Traore is one of several Sunderland stars heading to AfconCredit: AP Strasbourg v Crystal Palace, UEFA Conference League, Group Stage, Football, Stade de la Meinau Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France - 27 Nov 2025Ismaila Sarr might be heading to Afcon… if he can recover from an injuryCredit: Shutterstock Editorial

It’s no exaggeration to say that Afcon will significantly influence the Premier League standings, with managers privately frustrated about losing essential players as the fixtures accumulate.

And spare a thought for the players themselves, who are caught in a tug-of-war between their clubs, which insist they are needed for crucial matches, and their national teams, which inform them of their late arrival.

No other group of international footballers faces this kind of conflict.

This raises the question of whether Afcon could be rescheduled to avoid overlapping with the top European leagues.

Traditionally held in January, the tournament was moved to the summer of the northern hemisphere in 2019 to avoid clashing with European club football.

However, the extreme heat and the emergence of the FIFA Club World Cup have led to the 2021, 2023, and 2025 editions reverting back to the winter months.

And so, we find ourselves once again in this familiar cycle.

The old club-versus-country debate used to arise every few years, but now it feels constant — and each time Africa is involved, tensions seem to escalate.

The contradiction is stark: players cannot safely perform in 40°C heat during the summer, yet European leagues also struggle when 40 of their players vanish mid-season.

Rather than resolving the issue, FIFA appears content to throw a hand grenade into both schedules.

I'm not sure where this leaves us. Perhaps we should eliminate the absurd Club World Cup — but that seems unlikely!