Table of Contents
The Department of State Services (DSS) has remained silent regarding the reported summons of Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed, who was Peter Obi’s running mate in the Labour Party during the 2023 presidential election.
This follows a report on Friday indicating that Baba-Ahmed, who is also the founder of Baze University, was invited by the DSS due to his remarks that are believed to have the potential to heighten political tensions in the country.
As per security analyst Zagazola Makama, unnamed security sources have confirmed that the invitation was prompted by concerns over Baba-Ahmed’s recent statements on various media platforms, especially his repeated assertions of an impending “constitutional crisis.”
One source mentioned that the 2023 Labour Party vice-presidential candidate recently appeared on national television, where he accused the judiciary and the military of facilitating the swearing-in of President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima.
The source further indicated that Baba-Ahmed allegedly claimed the military has been emboldened to “look you in the face and call you bloody fools” due to the inauguration.
“The secret police are approaching his comments with caution. This situation transcends politics; it’s about protecting the national integrity,” the source asserted.
As of the time of this report, the DSS has not released an official statement concerning this matter.
Frequently Asked Questions
What has the DSS said about the alleged summon of Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed?
The DSS has not made any official statements regarding the alleged summon of Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed.
Why was Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed invited by the DSS?
He was invited due to concerns about his comments that could potentially escalate political tensions in the country, particularly his claims of a looming "constitutional crisis."
What did Baba-Ahmed say that raised concerns?
Baba-Ahmed accused the judiciary and military of enabling the swearing-in of President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima, suggesting that the military felt empowered to disrespect citizens.



