The Resource Centre for Human Rights and Civic Education (CHRICED) has criticised the Federal Government’s plan to set aside N135.22 billion for anticipated election-related court cases ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The organisation described the allocation as worrying and questioned the government’s priorities in managing the electoral process.
This was contained in a statement signed by the Executive Director of CHRICED, Dr Ibrahim M. Zikirullahi, on Friday.
According to the group, the allocation appears within the Service Wide Votes in the revised 2026 budget and represents about 15.48 per cent of the total election budget.
CHRICED expressed concern over what it described as a lack of transparency surrounding the decision, noting that the purpose and management of the funds were not clearly explained.
“This development raises urgent questions about Nigeria’s electoral direction and the government’s commitment to transparency, accountability, and credible democratic processes,” the group said.
It further argued that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) already has legal departments across the country, making such a large litigation fund unnecessary.
“The sudden appearance of this budget line raises serious red flags about transparency and intent,” CHRICED stated.
The group also warned that the allocation sends a negative message about the country’s electoral system.
“Budgeting such a huge amount for election disputes suggests an expectation of electoral failure rather than a commitment to preventing it,” it said.
CHRICED questioned whether the government was indirectly preparing for post-election legal battles instead of strengthening the electoral process to reduce disputes. The organisation also cautioned that the development could weaken public trust in democracy at a time when many Nigerians are already facing economic hardship. It noted that funds of such magnitude could be better used to improve voter education, electoral logistics, technology systems and staff training to reduce election disputes.
CHRICED added that the same resources could also support key sectors such as health, education, agriculture and security if properly redirected. It therefore called on the federal government to explain the rationale behind the allocation and ensure full transparency in its use.
It also urged authorities to prioritise electoral reforms that prevent disputes rather than spending heavily on resolving them after elections: “Nigeria cannot continue to institutionalise electoral dysfunction or normalise budgeting for its consequences. The integrity of elections must be protected at the source, not negotiated in court after the fact. The time has come to restore credibility, rebuild trust, and ensure that democracy truly reflects the will of the Nigerian people.”
Eze Chidiebere Paul
I'm dedicated to creating high-quality content that informs, inspires, and delights. If you have any questions or suggestions, don't hesitate to get in touch. Happy reading!
